|
Post by gands on Jun 11, 2008 18:14:24 GMT 8
I started this thread to know how people think of these two commonly played games. I'll start:
MILSIM Pros: 1. non confrontational between participating teams 2. more realistic battle scenarios 3. lesser requirement for marshalls or officials 4. less strain for aeg 5. makes you think
Cons: 1. less number of games for each team 2. can get dragging given the number of participating teams
SPEEDBALL pros 1. adrenaline game 2. speed game
cons 1. highly confrontational 2. unrealistic 3. no brainer 4. expensive given the volume of bb's you spray each game 5. high reliance on marshall's call. More often than not, players not admitting hits.
|
|
|
Post by francis on Jun 11, 2008 19:29:52 GMT 8
Enough Said...
|
|
|
Post by silverarrow on Jun 15, 2008 8:40:24 GMT 8
Nicely presented Gands. For me, i like Milsim than speedball 'coz like what you said, "it's more realistic" although I sometime like and miss the rush of a speedball game.
|
|
|
Post by wheitmann on Jun 15, 2008 22:29:06 GMT 8
Is there any point discussing this on our boards? Sorry to be harsh, but now that NSW-8 is gearing up, focusing on actual combat loadouts, it's natural to favor MILSIM.
|
|